Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | f769dd83-6288-2c37-4958-b7ddad0bc974@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/31/2016 05:01 AM, Jim Nasby wrote: > On 10/30/16 1:32 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote: >> >> Now, maybe this has nothing to do with PostgreSQL itself, but maybe it's >> some sort of CPU / OS scheduling artifact. For example, the system has >> 36 physical cores, 72 virtual ones (thanks to HT). I find it strange >> that the "good" client counts are always multiples of 72, while the >> "bad" ones fall in between. >> >> 72 = 72 * 1 (good) >> 108 = 72 * 1.5 (bad) >> 144 = 72 * 2 (good) >> 180 = 72 * 2.5 (bad) >> 216 = 72 * 3 (good) >> 252 = 72 * 3.5 (bad) >> 288 = 72 * 4 (good) >> >> So maybe this has something to do with how OS schedules the tasks, or >> maybe some internal heuristics in the CPU, or something like that. > > It might be enlightening to run a series of tests that are 72*.1 or *.2 > apart (say, 72, 79, 86, ..., 137, 144). Yeah, I've started a benchmark with client a step of 6 clients 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 ... 252 258 264 270 276 282 288 instead of just 36 72 108 144 180 216 252 288 which did a test every 36 clients. To compensate for the 6x longer runs, I'm only running tests for "group-update" and "master", so I should have the results in ~36h. regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: