Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table |
Дата | |
Msg-id | f6f2790d-4c30-349a-ab37-c11730169b9a@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/29/17 15:38, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > I just realized there's a further problem in the area: when a partition > is detached from its parent, its indexes are not made independent of the > indexes on parent. So they can't be dropped on their own (booh!); and > dropping the index on the former parent partitioned table drops the > index on the former partition also (hiss!). I think the fix for this is > to delete all dependencies, and re-register normal ones. Should be > straightforward, but I'm not doing it this year. We're waiting for an updated patch in this thread, aren't we? -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: