Re: Concurrency testing
От | Jeff Janes |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Concurrency testing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | f67928030910071718s44c55862l7bd49b98f5bd4339@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Concurrency testing (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Concurrency testing
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:38 AM, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 10:28:08AM -0700, David Wheeler wrote: >> On Oct 7, 2009, at 9:53 AM, David Fetter wrote: >> >>> At the moment, we have no way to test this, although with certain >>> Perl modules, it would be pretty trivial. >> >> No non-core modules necessary. Jus use Test::More and file handles >> opened via pipes to two or more psql sessions. I'd much rather live without Test::More and use DBD::Pg, then have Test::More but need to open pipes to psql to talk to the database, rather than using DBI to do it. But I guess we would need to worry about whether we can make DBD::Pg work with the installation being tested, rather than finding some other install. > > When did Test::More become core? I believe we support back to Perl > 5.6 :/ Do we need to restrict ourselves to core? Developers already need flex and bison, which aren't needed when installing from the tarball. Couldn't we also have "make dev-check" that has higher requirements than "make check" does, but does a more thorough job? Jeff
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: