On 1/19/18 16:54, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> If the only problem is that buildfarm would run tests twice, then I
> think we should just press forward with this regardless of that: it
> seems a chicken-and-egg problem, because buildfarm cannot be upgraded to
> use some new test method if the method doesn't exist yet. As a
> solution, let's just live with some run duplication for a period until
> the machines are upgraded to a future buildfarm client code.
Well, people protested against that approach.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services