Strange behavior of plpgsql.
От | Alex du Plessis |
---|---|
Тема | Strange behavior of plpgsql. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | f63442d70911040705t53691bf4of220732e0bd9e33c@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Strange behavior of plpgsql.
|
Список | pgsql-novice |
Hello list
I just noticed a strange quirk of plpgsql. It gave me an error when trying to access a member of a complex field in NEW. Error reported was: "ERROR: NEW used in query that is not in a rule".
However, it seems that plsql rather has a problem with the double dot i.e. NEW.amount.direction and could not parse that (or did not have any knowledge of the complex type).
I found a workaround by first declaring a local variable to the complex type DECLARE amnt tlx_actamount;
and then assigning the complex field to this variable. It seems plpgsql is quite happy to accept such a consstruct.
As an example :
plpgsql will not accept
NEW.amount.direction ..and give the error listed above
It will however be happy with:
DECLARE amnt tlx_amount;
...
amnt:=NEW.amount;
Hope this sheds some light for a guru
Regards
--
Alex du Plessis
I just noticed a strange quirk of plpgsql. It gave me an error when trying to access a member of a complex field in NEW. Error reported was: "ERROR: NEW used in query that is not in a rule".
However, it seems that plsql rather has a problem with the double dot i.e. NEW.amount.direction and could not parse that (or did not have any knowledge of the complex type).
I found a workaround by first declaring a local variable to the complex type DECLARE amnt tlx_actamount;
and then assigning the complex field to this variable. It seems plpgsql is quite happy to accept such a consstruct.
As an example :
plpgsql will not accept
NEW.amount.direction ..and give the error listed above
It will however be happy with:
DECLARE amnt tlx_amount;
...
amnt:=NEW.amount;
Hope this sheds some light for a guru
Regards
--
Alex du Plessis
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: