Re: DROP SUBSCRIPTION with no slot
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DROP SUBSCRIPTION with no slot |
Дата | |
Msg-id | f5d48b96-f135-efad-a1d1-369984c7d18b@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | DROP SUBSCRIPTION with no slot (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: DROP SUBSCRIPTION with no slot
Re: DROP SUBSCRIPTION with no slot |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-09-24 16:31, Jeff Janes wrote: > I recently had to cut loose (pg_drop_replication_slot) a logical replica > that couldn't keep up and so was threatening to bring down the master. > > In mopping up on the replica side, I couldn't just drop the > subscription, because it couldn't drop the nonexistent slot on the > master and so refused to work. So I had to do a silly little dance > where I first disable the subscription, then ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... SET > (slot_name = NONE), then drop it. > > Wanting to clean up after itself is admirable, but if there is nothing > to clean up, why should that be an error condition? The alternatives seem quite error prone to me. Better be explicit. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: