Re: pgsql: Make WAL segment size configurable at initdb time.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Steele
Тема Re: pgsql: Make WAL segment size configurable at initdb time.
Дата
Msg-id f572c66f-1840-b789-04e2-b767f4765c3a@pgmasters.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pgsql: Make WAL segment size configurable at initdb time.  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
Ответы Re: pgsql: Make WAL segment size configurable at initdb time.  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-committers
On 10/5/18 1:03 PM, David Steele wrote:
> Hi Andres,
> 
> On 10/5/18 5:54 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 2018-09-20 11:48:08 -0400, David Steele wrote:
>>
>>> diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
>>> index e1073ac6d3..3bfd172441 100644
>>> --- a/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
>>> +++ b/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
>>> @@ -8440,10 +8440,8 @@ dynamic_library_path =
>>> 'C:\tools\postgresql;H:\my_project\lib;$libdir'
>>>         </term>
>>>         <listitem>
>>>          <para>
>>> -        Reports the number of blocks (pages) in a WAL segment file.
>>> -        The total size of a WAL segment file in bytes is equal to
>>> -        <varname>wal_segment_size</varname> multiplied by
>>> <varname>wal_block_size</varname>;
>>> -        by default this is 16MB.  See <xref
>>> linkend="wal-configuration"/> for
>>> +        Reports the size of write ahead log segments.
>>> +        The default value is 16MB. See <xref
>>> linkend="wal-configuration"/> for
>>>           more information.
>>>          </para>
>>>         </listitem>
>>
>> Why is this actually more correct? You mean because we have a conversion
>> that does the mb conversion at display time?
> 
> In pre-11 versions of Postgres, you get this:
> 
> postgres=# select setting, unit from pg_settings where name =
> 'wal_segment_size';
>  setting | unit
> ---------+------
>  2048    | 8kB
> 
> But in v11 you get this:
> 
> select setting, unit from pg_settings where name = 'wal_segment_size';
>  setting  | unit
> ----------+------
>  16777216 | B
> 
> So, while the WAL segment size used to be expressed in terms of 8K pages
> it is now expressed in terms of absolute bytes.  This seemed to me to be
> a very deliberate change in the original commit so I guessed it was done
> for clarity, but that the docs didn't get the message.

Thoughts on this?

I know it's minor in the grand scheme of things but it caused me some
confusion when I was updating pgBackRest for v11 and I imagine it might
do the same for others.

-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net


В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: pgsql: Fix missing role dependencies for some schema and type ACLs.
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: pgsql: Fix error-cleanup mistakes in exec_stmt_call().