Re: [HACKERS] TAP tests - installcheck vs check
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] TAP tests - installcheck vs check |
Дата | |
Msg-id | f4ee2bce-3582-06ca-9e77-c67bb1b66fea@2ndQuadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] TAP tests - installcheck vs check (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] TAP tests - installcheck vs check
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/25/2017 11:13 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > >> I'm in the process of moving all the buildfarm tests to use check >> instead of installcheck, but in such a way that it doesn't constantly >> generate redundant installs. > But is that something only of interest to the buildfarm, or should we > do something in the Makefile infrastructure to make it more generally > available? It already is. If you have a temp_install with all the required pieces do "make NO_TEMP_INSTALL=1 check" The logic I am adding to the buildfarm is essentially to install contrib and test_modules in the temp install directory as part of their install steps and to check that that's been done before using NO_TEMP_INSTALL. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: