Re: PGC_SIGHUP shared_buffers?
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PGC_SIGHUP shared_buffers? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | f4ad3382-2240-4776-8e03-d9b4ab1a1302@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PGC_SIGHUP shared_buffers? (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: PGC_SIGHUP shared_buffers?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/19/24 13:13, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2024-02-19 09:19:16 -0500, Joe Conway wrote: >> Couldn't we scale the rounding, e.g. allow small allocations as we do now, >> but above some number always round? E.g. maybe >= 2GB round to the nearest >> 256MB, >= 4GB round to the nearest 512MB, >= 8GB round to the nearest 1GB, >> etc? > > That'd make the translation considerably more expensive. Which is important, > given how common an operation this is. Perhaps it is not practical, doesn't help, or maybe I misunderstand, but my intent was that the rounding be done/enforced when setting the GUC value which surely cannot be that often. -- Joe Conway PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: