Re: 9.0: Too many features. Help us choose!
От | Greg Sabino Mullane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 9.0: Too many features. Help us choose! |
Дата | |
Msg-id | f46bf04bbdceae06bfbca1f02815b95b@biglumber.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 9.0: Too many features. Help us choose! (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 > So I'm compiling this, and I was surprised to see that a lot of people > didn't consider the overhauled LISTEN/NOTIFY to be a major feature. For > those who voted "not a major feature", what was the reasoning? I'm curious. Because it acts exactly the same as before? From a user/usage perspective, nothing has changed, and most people don't bump up against the current limitations. I'm excited about it because Bucardo uses LISTEN/NOTIFY a *lot*, so this will be a win. Although the overhead of the current listen system still pales in comparison to the overhead of triggers. It will be nice to start using payloads as well. Those should be mentioned explicitly if they are not already. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201006220907 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAkwgtcwACgkQvJuQZxSWSsh+RwCgggrpCeQ4Nb46coG8YVG4YOIj yzQAoK9hTo7oA7eAgk7WwtKcg56VkNRA =/4cn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: