Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL"
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | f4572891-e001-f029-f95b-9440c8cc1509@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | "an SQL" vs. "a SQL" (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL"
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10.06.21 09:26, David Rowley wrote: > It seems we have no standard as to if we say "a SQL" or "an SQL". The SQL standard uses "an SQL-something". > However, we mostly use "an SQL" in the docs. > > ~/pg_src$ cd doc/ > ~/pg_src/doc$ git grep -E "\s(a|A)\sSQL\s" | wc -l > 55 > ~/pg_src/doc$ git grep -E "\s(an|An)\sSQL\s" | wc -l > 94 > > I think we should change all 55 instances of "a SQL" in the docs to > use "an SQL" and leave the 800 other instances of "a SQL" alone. > Changing those does not seem worthwhile as it could cause > back-patching pain. agreed > Further, there might be a few more in the docs that we might want to > consider changing: > > git grep -E "\sa\s(A|E|F|H|I|L|M|N|O|S|X)[A-Z]{2,5}\s" > > I see "a FSM", "a FIFO", "a SSPI", "a SASL", "a MCV", "a SHA", "a SQLDA" > > My regex foo is not strong enough to think how I might find multiline instances. Um, of those, I pronounce FIFO, SASL, and SHA as words, with an "a" article.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: