Re: [HACKERS] Cleanup: avoid direct use of ip_posid/ip_blkid
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Cleanup: avoid direct use of ip_posid/ip_blkid |
Дата | |
Msg-id | f41a81e3-1849-dad1-d2c6-9e9ac0e4d056@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] Cleanup: avoid direct use of ip_posid/ip_blkid (Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Cleanup: avoid direct use of ip_posid/ip_blkid
Re: [HACKERS] Cleanup: avoid direct use of ip_posid/ip_blkid |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/22/17 08:38, Pavan Deolasee wrote: > One reason why these macros are not always used is because they > typically do assert-validation to ensure ip_posid has a valid value. > There are a few places in code, especially in GIN and also when we are > dealing with user-supplied TIDs when we might get a TID with invalid > ip_posid. I've handled that by defining and using separate macros which > skip the validation. This doesn't seem any worse than what we are > already doing. I wonder why we allow that. Shouldn't the tid type reject input that has ip_posid == 0? -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: