Re: [HACKERS] merging some features from plpgsql2 project
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] merging some features from plpgsql2 project |
Дата | |
Msg-id | f31aadff-49de-6a3b-18ce-98b78b54d414@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] merging some features from plpgsql2 project (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] merging some features from plpgsql2 project
Re: [HACKERS] merging some features from plpgsql2 project |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/10/17 12:06 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > A check how much rows was impacted by query is relative often task. So > we can do this task more user friendly. > > Second motivation - ROW_COUNT is working for static and for dynamic SQL > - it can be partial replace of FOUND variable. What is stopping anyone from claiming that their favorite diagnostic item is also a relatively often task and request it to become an automatic variable? Where does it stop? It's not like PL/pgSQL is the king of brevity. Creating inconsistent and arbitrary warts to save a few characters does not appear appealing. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: