Re: post-freeze damage control
От | David Steele |
---|---|
Тема | Re: post-freeze damage control |
Дата | |
Msg-id | f2e7f916-b32f-48ac-8200-7a803a241b5e@pgmasters.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: post-freeze damage control ("Andrey M. Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: post-freeze damage control
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/10/24 01:59, Andrey M. Borodin wrote: > >> On 9 Apr 2024, at 18:45, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: >> >> Maybe we should explicitly advise users to not delete that WAL from >> their archives, until pg_combinebackup is hammered a bit more. > > As a backup tool maintainer, I always reference to out-of-the box Postgres tools as some bulletproof alternative. > I really would like to stick to this reputation and not discredit these tools. +1. Even so, only keeping WAL for the last backup is a dangerous move in any case. Lots of things can happen to a backup (other than bugs in the software) so keeping WAL back to the last full (or for all backups) is always an excellent idea. Regards, -David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: