Re: "could not read block 0... " error followed by "database does not exist"
От | Janet S Jacobsen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "could not read block 0... " error followed by "database does not exist" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | f25e81a21873.4b75d132@lbl.gov обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: "could not read block 0... " error followed by "database does not exist"
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Hi. What I see when I do ls on the current (corrupt) $PGDATA/global is ... - rw------- 1 jsjacobs deepsky 0 Feb 8 18:51 1262 ... -rw------- 1 jsjacobs deepsky 602 Feb 12 17:42 pg_auth -rw------- 1 jsjacobs deepsky 8192 Feb 12 17:42 pg_control -rw------- 1 jsjacobs deepsky 0 Feb 12 17:42 pg_database -rw------- 1 jsjacobs deepsky 10927 Feb 12 21:57 pgstat.stat I have a pgdump from a month ago. Are you saying to restore that to a different location and then copy over $PGDATA/global/1262? Do I also need to copy over $PGDATA/global/pg_database? Thanks, Janet Tom Lane wrote: > Janet S Jacobsen <JSJacobsen@lbl.gov> writes: >> Hi. I am running Postgres 8.2.7 on a Linux system for over >> a year now with no problems. > >> Today one of the database users reported the following error: > >> psql: FATAL: could not read block 0 of relation 1664/0/1262: read >> only 0 of 8192 bytes > > Ugh. 1262 is pg_database --- apparently something has truncated your > pg_database table to zero bytes :-(. Which certainly explains the > "no such database" errors. > > Have you got any chance of pulling that physical file from a backup? > The one bright spot here is that pg_database is pretty static in most > installations, so you could probably use even a not-very-current copy. > The file you want is $PGDATA/global/1262. > > I don't offhand know of any bugs in 8.2.7 that could cause this, > though that is rather an old version ... you might want to think > about an update to 8.2.something-recent. > > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: