Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.
От | Teodor Sigaev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | f25a35a4-6e65-d126-8dfd-d88bb46da952@sigaev.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold. (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thanks for everyone, pushed with minor editorization Alexander Korotkov wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:42 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com > <mailto:sawada.mshk@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 8:01 PM, Alexander Korotkov > > So, I would like to clarify why could my patch block future improvements > > in this area? For instance, if we would decide to make btree able to skip > > cleanup when some delete pages are pending for recycle, we can add > > it in future. > > > > Anyway, for approaches of this feature I agree your version patch and > your patch looks good to me as the first step of this feature. > > > Agreed. I think we got consensus that this patch is good first step, > which doesn't block further enhancements in future. > > So, I'm attaching rebased version of patch and marking this RFC. > > ------ > Alexander Korotkov > Postgres Professional:http://www.postgrespro.com <http://www.postgrespro.com/> > The Russian Postgres Company -- Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: