Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat_activity.waiting_start
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat_activity.waiting_start |
Дата | |
Msg-id | f1e01a23-a48c-f7cf-53e2-697e6531aad3@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat_activity.waiting_start (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat_activity.waiting_start
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/28/16 7:10 AM, Amit Kapila wrote: > Can we think of introducing new guc trace_system_waits or something > like that which will indicate that the sessions will report the value > of wait_start in pg_stat_activity? The default value of such a > parameter can be false which means wait_start will be shown as NULL in > pg_stat_activity and when it is enabled the wait_start can show the > time as proposed in this thread. In my experience the problem with those kind of settings is that they're never enabled when you actually need them. I think it'd be much better to find a way to always capture wait_starts that are over some minimum duration, where collection overhead won't matter but you still have some good info about what's going on. For pg_stat_activity I'd think that threshold would be on the order of 50-100ms, though maybe there's other places where a tighter tolerance would help. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: