Re: Backup solution over unreliable network
От | David Steele |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Backup solution over unreliable network |
Дата | |
Msg-id | f185987a-6a38-055e-d4e7-fe53db824096@pgmasters.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Backup solution over unreliable network (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
On 11/30/18 10:29 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Achilleas Mantzios (achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com) wrote: >> On 30/11/18 2:06 μ.μ., Stephen Frost wrote: >>>> - I have only read the best reviews about PgBackRest, can PgBackRest address those issues? >>> Glad to hear you've read good reviews about pgbackrest. As for <...> > We've also considered supporting archive-mode=always and being able to > have the standby also push WAL and while we may support that in the > future, I'd say it's farther down on the list than multi-repo support. > As I recall, David Steele also had some specific technical concerns > around how to handle two systems pushing into the same WAL archive. > Having archive-mode=always be allowed if it's going to an independent > repo is an interesting thought though and might be simpler to do. The issue here is ensuring that only one system is writing to the repository at a time. This is easy enough if there is a dedicated repo-host but is much harder if the repo is on something like S3 or NFS. Using independent repos might work, but we'd need a way to ensure the configuration doesn't get broken. Regards, -- -David david@pgmasters.net
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: