Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2
От | Martin Goodson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | f081e013-9346-2bb9-133b-0ed85584fad9@googlemail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2 (Martin Goodson <kaemaril@googlemail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 16/05/2017 16:39, Martin Goodson wrote: > On 16/05/2017 15:58, Adrian Klaver wrote: >>> /bin/ld: warning: libssl.so.1.0.0, needed by >>> /db_demo/app/postgres/9.6.2-3/lib/libpq.so, may conflict with >>> libssl.so.10 >>> /lib64/libldap_r-2.4.so.2: undefined reference to `ber_sockbuf_io_udp' >>> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status >>> make: *** [repmgrd] Error 1 >> Not sure what is going on here. My usual reaction to a message like >> this when compiling is to install the --devel package for the library >> involved. In this case I believe it would be something like: >> >> openldap2-devel > > OK, thank you. I'll pass that along to our UNIX team and ask for that > to be installed, see what we get ... > >> >> This is just an off the top of the head suggestion, no warranty:) > What? You mean I can't get my money back? :) > > Many thanks for all the help so far. It's been very, very, helpful. > I'm sure it's nearly there ... Drat. Didn't work. openldap2-devel was installed OK, reran the make, got the same error :( Here's what's installed according to rpm -qa openldap-devel-2.4.40-9.e17_2.x86_64 openldap-2.4.40.9.e17_2.x86_64 Regards, Martin. -- Martin Goodson "Have you thought up some clever plan, Doctor?" "Yes, Jamie, I believe I have." "What're you going to do?" "Bung a rock at it."
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: