Re: Build failure with GCC 15 (defaults to -std=gnu23)
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Build failure with GCC 15 (defaults to -std=gnu23) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | eu34f6armrlbq7cdai3dy45576h3qybme47uxens4cowpghzqe@52owmagijfiu обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Build failure with GCC 15 (defaults to -std=gnu23) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Build failure with GCC 15 (defaults to -std=gnu23)
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
Hi,
On 2024-11-27 13:28:24 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> > Pushed. Alligator is turning green in the back branches, only one more to go.
> > I see that Peter also pushed the reserved word patches. Apparently
> > that gcc bug it's blowing up on might go away with -g0 (see link
> > earlier), but anyway it's a nightly build compiler so fingers crossed
> > for a fix soon. The newer branches are building and running for me on
> > { gcc14, gcc15, clang18 } -std=gnu23, and apparently the bug was even
> > in gcc14, so it must require some unlikely conditions that alligator
> > has stumbled on.
>
> Looks like flaviventris and serinus just updated to the same broken
> compiler version that alligator is using :-(. Maybe we'd better
> file a formal bug report?
I run a development gcc locally, and I just had updated it this morning
(4a868591169). Interestingly I don't see the ICE with it.
But I can reproduce it with debian sid's gcc-snapshot, with exactly the same
compiler arguments. The snapshot's version:
gcc (Debian 20241123-1) 15.0.0 20241123 (experimental) [master r15-5606-g4aa4162e365]
so it looks like the bug might have been fixed recently?
I'm not sure this is really the bug linked to earlier [1]. I can't repro the
issue with 14, for example.
It's possible it requires specific gcc configure flags to be triggered?
Luckily -g1 does, at least locally, work around the issue with
gcc-snapshot. So I guess I'll make flaviventris and serinus use that for now
:/
Greetings,
Andres Freund
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113688
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: