Re: AW: [HACKERS] Really slow query on 6.4.2

Then <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> spoke up and said:
> I'm not convinced that accurate stats are worth that cost, but I don't
> know how big the cost would be anyway.  Anyone have a feel for it?

They are definitely *not* worth the cost.  Especially since no table
will have the default 0 rows entry after a single vacuum analyze of
that table.  Let's be honest: if you aren't interested in doing a
vacuum, then really aren't interested in performance, anyway.

-- 
=====================================================================
| JAVA must have been developed in the wilds of West Virginia.      |
| After all, why else would it support only single inheritance??    |
=====================================================================
| Finger geek@cmu.edu for my public key.                            |
=====================================================================