Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
От | Greg Sabino Mullane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | efd7a2a239337acbe33ae74b8b92dd31@biglumber.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Tom Lane wrote: > My vote is to reject the patch and work on a config checker. +1 > postgres=# set work_mem = '1g'; > ERROR: invalid value for parameter "work_mem": "1g" Perhaps this would be a great place for a HINT listing all valid inputs, if not there already? - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com End Point Corporation PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200809081014 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAkjFM2AACgkQvJuQZxSWSsiDvACdE6Wlrnu3uQH4mOpuEMvX0VQe rXoAoPLCR5jKTWQH4GsHDtz5NNZXq4vA =nRMS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: