Melvin Davidson wrote:
> "seriously flawed" is a bit of a stretch. Most sane developers would not
> have schema names of one letter.
> They usually name a schema something practical, which totally avoids your
> nit picky exception.
That's confusing the example with the problem it shows.
Another example could be:
if the source schema is "public" and the function body contains
GRANT SELECT on sometable to public;
then this statement would be wrongly altered by replace().
My objection is not about some corner case: it's the general
idea of patching the entire body of a function without a fully-fledged
parser that is dead on arrival.
Best regards,
--
Daniel Vérité
PostgreSQL-powered mailer: http://www.manitou-mail.org
Twitter: @DanielVerite