Re: Clause accidentally pushed down ( Possible bug in Making Vars outer-join aware)
От | Andrey Lepikhov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Clause accidentally pushed down ( Possible bug in Making Vars outer-join aware) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | efb33bee-145d-95a8-1048-2e7b8f282e2c@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Clause accidentally pushed down ( Possible bug in Making Vars outer-join aware) (Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Clause accidentally pushed down ( Possible bug in Making Vars outer-join aware)
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 23/2/2023 11:36, Richard Guo wrote: > I've realized this hack is not correct :-(. References to A Vars and B > Vars in higher qual levels do not need this adjustment. So this code > change would add unnecessary relids for clauses that involve A Vars or B > Vars but not C Vars, resulting them being placed at higher place than > needed. > > Maybe what we need is to add in commute_below_l (assuming it has been > recorded in SpecialJoinInfo) rather than commute_below of outer joins > mentioned within the clause? Doing a comparison of pg15 and master initsplan.c I found that a clear and documented algorithm for delaying the application of a qual is lost or replaced with some commute_* fields. It is not clear how we guarantee correct application delay of a qual. Which part of the code implements it now? -- regards, Andrey Lepikhov Postgres Professional
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: