Re: CREATE/ALTER ROLE PASSWORD ('value' USING 'method')

On 04/06/2017 08:33 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:10:59AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 4:59 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 1:17 AM, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 03/07/2017 08:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>>>> Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>>>> here is a separate thread dedicated to the following extension for
>>>>>>> CREATE/ALTER ROLE: PASSWORD ('value' USING 'method').
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The parentheses seem weird ... do we really need those?
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> Seeing 3 opinions in favor of that, let's do so then. I have updated
>>>> the patch to not use parenthesis.
>>>
>>> The regression tests only exercise the CREATE ROLE...USING version, not the
>>> ALTER ROLE...USING version.
>>
>> Done.
>>
>>> +        and <literal>plain</> for an non-hashed password.  If the password
>>> +        string is already in MD5-hashed or SCRAM-hashed, then it is
>>> +        stored hashed as-is.
>>>
>>> In the last line, I think "stored as-is" sounds better.
>>
>> Okay.
>>
>>> Other than that, it looks good to me.
>>
>> Thanks for the review. Attached is an updated patch.
>
> [Action required within three days.  This is a generic notification.]
>
> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item.

This isn't critical, SCRAM is fully functional without this new syntax. 
I think we should drop this, and revisit for Postgres 11, if it feels 
like we still want this then. I'll remove this from the open items list.

- Heikki