Re: valgrind on initdb
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: valgrind on initdb |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ee277558-d735-07bb-925c-944b97a1cb67@2ndQuadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: valgrind on initdb (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: valgrind on initdb
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/7/18 9:11 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote: > > On 11/7/18 2:47 PM, John Naylor wrote: >> On 11/7/18, Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> While looking at [1] (included in 23315.log) there are other warnings as >>> well. >> Perhaps it's worth revisiting to make debugging easier, but right now >> initdb.c has this comment: >> >> * Note: >> * The program has some memory leakage - it isn't worth cleaning it up. >> > Maybe. I certainly don't think it's not worth the time merely for the > sake of fixing the memory leaks. The reasoning here is that initdb runs > for a short period of time (a couple of seconds, really), and the memory > gets released when the process exits. And the leaks are tiny in general > - a couple of bytes here and there. Had there been a massive memory leak > that would change the equation of course. > Yeah, I'm pretty sure I wrote that comment 15 or so years ago in the first C implementation of initdb. I don't think my opinion has changed much. We're talking about kilobytes, here, nothing massive. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: