Re: [HACKERS] Partitions: \d vs \d+

On 09/28/2017 09:19 AM, Maksim Milyutin wrote:
>> E.g. "No partition constraint" vs. "Partition constraint: 
>> satisfies_hash_partition(...)".
> 
> I also noticed ambiguity in printing "No partition constraint" in 
> non-verbose mode and "Partition constraint:..." in verbose one for 
> partition tables regardless of the type of partition.
> Attached small patch removes any output about partition constraint in 
> non-verbose mode.
> 

Yeah, that could be one way.

It should likely be backported to REL_10_STABLE, so the question is if 
we are too late in the release cycle to change that output.

Best regards, Jesper


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers