Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level.
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ed0f268e-8313-872b-95b6-deaba725252f@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level. (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/24/16 11:57 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > Today, since the host part can't include a > port specifier, it's regarded as part of the IP address, and I think > it would probably be a bad idea to change that, as I believe Victor's > patch would. He seems to have it in mind that we could allow things > like host=[1:2:3::4:5:6] or host=[1:2:3::4:5]:6, which would might be > helpful for the future but doesn't avoid changing the meaning of > connection strings that work today. Let's keep in mind here that the decision to allow database names to contain a connection parameter substructure has caused some security issues. Let's not create more levels of ambiguity and the need to pass around override flags. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: