Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions

On 3/2/18 8:01 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2018-03-03 02:00:46 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> That is somewhat misleading, I think. You're right the last version was
>> submitted on 2018-01-19, but the next review arrived on 2018-01-31, i.e.
>> right at the end of the CF. So it's not like the patch was sitting there
>> with unresolved issues. Based on that review the patch was marked as RWF
>> and thus not moved to 2018-03 automatically.
> 
> I don't see how this changes anything.

I agree that things could be clearer, and Andres has produced a great
document that we can build on.  The old one had gotten a bit stale.

However, I think it's pretty obvious that a CF entry should be
accompanied with a patch.  It sounds like the timing was awkward but you
still had 28 days to produce a new patch.

I also notice that you submitted 7 patches in this CF but are reviewing
zero.

-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net