Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning

Hi David.

On 2018/02/17 18:24, David Rowley wrote:
> On 2 February 2018 at 23:03, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> I started wondering if it's not such a good idea to make
>> PartitionClauseInfo a Node at all?  I went back to your earlier message
>> [1] where you said that it's put into the Append node for run-time pruning
>> to use, but it doesn't sound nice that we'd be putting into the plan
>> something that's looks more like scratchpad for the partition.c code.  I
>> think we should try to keep PartitionClauseInfo in partition.h and put
>> only the list of matched bare clauses into Append.
> 
> That sounds like a good idea.
> 
> A patch which puts this back is attached.
> 
> I've changed the run-time prune patch to process the clause lists
> during execution instead.

Thank you.  I'll incorporate it in the version I'll send next.

Regards,
Amit