Re:
От | greg@turnstep.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ec013c456c58e9e723370d56b776c627@biglumber.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: (Andrew McMillan <andrew@catalyst.net.nz>) |
Ответы |
Re:
|
Список | pgsql-novice |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >>> Wouldn't there need to be an index on OID for your query to be fast? >>> >> No, the single index on the "date" field is enough. See the EXPLAIN >> output from my first post in the original thread: >> > However the original poster suggested there would ultimately be 200,000 > or more rows in the table. Yes, and my EXPLAIN is on a table with 200,000 rows in it. Hence the fact that it took over 5 seconds - which is still very fast compared to the original query. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200302101447 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html iD8DBQE+SAHxvJuQZxSWSsgRAkxTAJ9TnEAjypMGbv8ZRn55yqe/8AZyQgCcCUPm /dU6kHroxm1XpC0lUrvdY+Y= =GwmT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: