Re: Question about a CIDR based query
От | siganos@gmail.com (George Siganos) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Question about a CIDR based query |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ebba5a93.0406261506.7a0f7558@posting.google.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Question about a CIDR based query (Georgos Siganos <siganos@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Question about a CIDR based query
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
I did a vacuum analyze before I run the following explain June_03=# explain select * from tmp where route >>='62.1.1.0/24'; QUERY PLAN ----------------------------------------------------------------Seq Scan on tmp (cost=0.00..606.60 rows=14544 width=33) Filter: (route >>= '62.1.1.0/24'::cidr) (2 rows) The select returns just one route, Thanks josh@agliodbs.com (Josh Berkus) wrote in message news:<200406250900.08312.josh@agliodbs.com>... > Georgos, > > > select * from tmp where route >>= some_cidr > > Can you post an EXPLAIN ANALYZE for this? And when's the last time you ran > ANALYZE on the table? > > > The index on route is not used and I get a sequential scan. The index is > > used only for the <<= operator. > > Most likely Postgres thinks that the >>= query is returning 60% of your table, > which makes indexes useless. > > -- > Josh Berkus > Aglio Database Solutions > San Francisco > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: