Re: Advisory locks
От | Tom Paynter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Advisory locks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | eb753987c14e04cea1312930bd641a1a.squirrel@webmail.tdpe.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Advisory locks ("Tom Paynter" <tompaynter@tdpe.co.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
Thank you Sándor, Just out of interest, is the following done just to make sure a row exists: SELECT pg_advisory_lock(table_a_id) FROM table_a WHERE table_a_id=5; As opposed to: SELECT pg_advisory_lock(5); Cheers, Tom On Wed, February 11, 2015 10:40 am, daku.sandor@gmail.com wrote: > The parameter of the pg_advisory_lock is a simple bigint and of course it > is completely unaware of the source of the value. > > Regards, > Sándor Daku > > > Original Message > From: Tom Paynter > Sent: 2015. február 11., szerda 11:33 > To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org > Subject: [SQL] Advisory locks > > > Hello All, > > > I have a quick question about advisory locks, that I have not been able > to figure out from the documentation. > > > Say I have two tables: > CREATE TABLE table_a > ( > table_a_id serial primary key, some more rows.... ); > > > CREATE TABLE table_b > ( > table_b_id serial primary key, some more rows.... ); > > > > And I execute the following lines (from separate sessions): > SELECT pg_advisory_lock(table_a_id) FROM table_a WHERE table_a_id=5; > SELECT pg_advisory_lock(table_b_id) FROM table_b WHERE table_b_id=5; > > > > Will this try to acquire the same lock? > Or is the id tied to the table somehow? > > > > Thanks for your time. > Tom > > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql > >
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: