Re: [pgsql-pkg-debian] Missing Postgis.control
От | Markus Wanner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-pkg-debian] Missing Postgis.control |
Дата | |
Msg-id | eb34b0f5-1b73-e8c4-dbac-ef29c8e0c24c@bluegap.ch обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-pkg-debian] Missing Postgis.control (Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-pkg-debian] Missing Postgis.control
|
Список | pgsql-pkg-debian |
On 06/16/2017 10:31 AM, Christoph Berg wrote: > It doesn't say that it is needed for the initial installation as well. Correct, that should be included in the (long) description. > From UX viewpoint, it would be nice if "apt-get install > postgresql-9.6-postgis-2.3" just worked. It does. At least as long as you don't disable installation of recommended packages *and* don't another version of the scripts installed, already. Actually, even just installing `postgis` does the trick, then. > My idea would be: > > Package: postgresql-9.6-postgis-2.3 > Depends: postgresql-9.6-postgis-scripts IIRC that's what we had before, but reverted forth and back to versioned scripts packages... > ... users could even install older postgis extensions by using > the correct CREATE EXTENSION ... VERSION command. Does that work for older versions when postgis.control is from the most current one? IIRC that's the only file that really requires the -scripts packages to conflict. > Hrm. I'll try discussing that with the colleagues here, maybe they > have an idea. Thanks. Kind Regards Markus
В списке pgsql-pkg-debian по дате отправления: