Re: Adding the extension name to EData / log_line_prefix

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Adding the extension name to EData / log_line_prefix
Дата
Msg-id eb1c3195-8eb6-46c0-91be-44f2a79734c6@eisentraut.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Adding the extension name to EData / log_line_prefix  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Adding the extension name to EData / log_line_prefix
Список pgsql-hackers
On 14.05.24 01:11, Tom Lane wrote:
> The mechanism that Andres describes for sourcing the name seems a bit
> overcomplex though.  Why not just allow/require each extension to
> specify its name as a constant string?  We could force the matter by
> redefining PG_MODULE_MAGIC as taking an argument:
> 
>     PG_MODULE_MAGIC("hstore");

We kind of already have something like this, for NLS.  If you look for 
pg_bindtextdomain(TEXTDOMAIN) and ereport_domain(), this information 
already trickles into the vicinity of the error data.  Maybe the same 
thing could just be used for this, by wiring up the macros a bit 
differently.




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: