Re: a column definition list is required for functions returning "record"
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: a column definition list is required for functions returning "record" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | e9b9d379-a1a4-5e25-eda6-d09e09db5dd9@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: a column definition list is required for functions returning "record" (Alexander Farber <alexander.farber@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: a column definition list is required for functions
returning "record"
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 8/26/16 10:32 AM, Alexander Farber wrote: > Thank you, I was just wondering if there is a simpler way... but ok It would be nice if there was a way to pass dynamically formed records around, similar to how you can pass the results of row() around. Someone else has actually be asking about this at https://github.com/decibel/pg_lambda/issues/1. BTW, there's no advantage I can think of to using plpgsql just to return the output of a query. You'd be better off using a SQL function instead. Actually, I guess the plan for the plpgsql version would be cached; I'm not sure if the same is true for SQL functions. But you'd probably need a more complex query for that to be a win over the lighter weight nature of SQL functions. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: