Re: User documentation vs Official Docs
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: User documentation vs Official Docs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | e91b5f21-71b4-106b-5ec7-1c71ff1849b0@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | User documentation vs Official Docs ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: User documentation vs Official Docs
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 07/16/2018 01:32 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > -general. > > Over the last year as I have visited many meetups and interacted with > people at conferences etc... There are three prevailing issues that > continue to come up in contributing to the community. This email is > about one of them. Where is the "user" documentation? The official > documentation is awesome, if you know what you are doing. It is not > particularly useful for HOWTO style docs. There is some user > documentation in the wiki but let's be honest, writing a > blog/article/howto in a wiki is a pain in the butt. > > What does the community think about a community run, community > organized, sub project for USER documentation? This type of > documentation would be things like, "10 steps to configure replication", > "Dumb simple Postgres backups", "5 things to NEVER do with Postgres". I > imagine we would sort it by version (9.6/10.0 etc...) as well as break > it down via type (Administration, Tuning, Gotchas) etc... > > What do we think? Not sure this is much different from the Wiki unless: Who is going to?: 1) Run/maintain it. 2) Get people to contribute. 3) Edit new content, clean up old content > > Thanks! > > JD > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: