Re: Expand the use of check_canonical_path() for more GUCs
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Expand the use of check_canonical_path() for more GUCs |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | e8fdcee5-bfef-7707-a704-35bac35e5a11@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Expand the use of check_canonical_path() for more GUCs (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Expand the use of check_canonical_path() for more GUCs
Re: Expand the use of check_canonical_path() for more GUCs |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-05-19 09:09, Michael Paquier wrote: > While digging into my backlog, I have found this message from Peter E > mentioning about $subject: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e6aac026-174c-9952-689f-6bee76f9ab68@2ndquadrant.com > > It seems to me that it would be a good idea to make those checks more > consistent, and attached is a patch. That thread didn't resolve why check_canonical_path() is necessary there. Maybe the existing uses could be removed? -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: