Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres

On 08/31/2016 04:41 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I developed a minimally invasive patch for C++ support a few years ago
> shortly after I wrote that blog post.  Since there appears to have been
> some interest here now, I have updated that and split it up into logical
> chunks.
>
> So here you go.

Looking at this with the POV of what would make sense, even if we don't 
care about C++.

> The patches are numbered approximately in increasing order of dubiosity.
>  So 0001 is probably a straight bug fix, 0002 and 0003 are arguably
> minor bug fixes as well.  The patches through 0012 can probably be
> considered for committing in some form.  After that it gets a bit hackish.

0001-0003 look clear to me as well. 0006 - 0009 also seem OK. The rest 
really only make sense if we decided to make the switch to C++.

- Heikki