Re: Version Numbering
От | greg@turnstep.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Version Numbering |
Дата | |
Msg-id | e88040a2aa63b78f0ae0ba396dbfab4c@biglumber.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Version Numbering (Jason Hihn <jhihn@paytimepayroll.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Version Numbering
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > As we know, most hindrances to OSS adoption are psychological. For that > reason, do you think that maybe 7.4, if it contains native windows support, > should be called 8.0? No. This would never fly. Postgres has a reputation of sensible version numbering. I think it would have to be something more major to the underlying codebase than native Windows support before we jumped up to 8.0. Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200212130903 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html iD8DBQE9+ejevJuQZxSWSsgRAvEaAKDv0OuZsBU8JTftibU0RO11UAIN1ACfcdwV z3I5ESCM/8ZX94RyugrVDk0= =f1RM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: