Re: Adminpack removal
От | Philippe BEAUDOIN |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Adminpack removal |
Дата | |
Msg-id | e8774c84-ffa1-4a35-a7c8-a4fe96cf1b32@free.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Adminpack removal (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Le 01/07/2024 à 10:07, Daniel Gustafsson a écrit : >> On 28 Jun 2024, at 09:06, Philippe BEAUDOIN <phb.emaj@free.fr> wrote: >> So just looking in public repo covers probably less than 1% of the code. However, this may give a first idea, especialyif a feature use is already detected. > Searching for anything on Github is essentially a dead end since it reports so > many duplicates in forks etc. That being said, I did a lot of searching and > browsing to find users [0], but came up empty (apart from forks which already > maintain their own copy). A more targeted search is the Debian Code search > which at the time of removal (and well before then) showed zero occurrences of > adminpack functions in any packaged software, and no extensions which had > adminpack as a dependency. While not an exhaustive search by any means, it > does provide a good hint. > > Since you list no other extensions using adminpack to support keeping it, I > assume you also didn't find any when searching? I just said that there are much much more code in private repos (so not analyzable) than in the public ones. > > -- > Daniel Gustafsson > > [0] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/B07CC211-DE35-4AC5-BD4E-0C6466700B06%40yesql.se
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: