Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | e84013b6-b890-1c4c-2b82-eca185a2197c@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
This patch set was not updated for the 2018-07 commitfest, so moved to -09. On 09.03.18 17:07, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > I think this patch is not going to be ready for PG11. > > - It depends on some work in the thread "logical decoding of two-phase > transactions", which is still in progress. > > - Various details in the logical_work_mem patch (0001) are unresolved. > > - This being partially a performance feature, we haven't seen any > performance tests (e.g., which settings result in which latencies under > which workloads). > > That said, the feature seems useful and desirable, and the > implementation makes sense. There are documentation and tests. But > there is a significant amount of design and coding work still necessary. > > Attached is a fixup patch that I needed to make it compile. > > The last two patches in your series (0008, 0009) are labeled as bug > fixes. Would you like to argue that they should be applied > independently of the rest of the feature? > -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: