Re: Build with LTO / -flto on macOS
От | Wolfgang Walther |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Build with LTO / -flto on macOS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | e7371e31-eed0-482d-9c6f-aee9a0d88144@technowledgy.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Build with LTO / -flto on macOS (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Build with LTO / -flto on macOS
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut: > On 04.06.24 18:41, Tom Lane wrote: >> Relevant to this: I wonder what we think the supported macOS versions >> are, anyway. AFAICS, the buildfarm only covers current (Sonoma) >> and current-1 (Ventura) major versions, and only the latest minor >> versions in those OS branches. > > For other OS lines I think we are settling on supporting what the OS > vendor supports. So for macOS at the moment this would be current, > current-1, and current-2, per > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacOS_version_history#Releases>. So I tested both HEAD and v12 on current and current-5, both successful. That should cover current-1 and current-2, too. If you want me to test any other macOS versions inbetween, or any other PG versions, I can do that. I would really like to upstream those kind of patches and see them backpatched - otherwise we need to carry around those patches for up to 5 years in the distros. And in light of the discussion in [1] my goal is to reduce the number of patches carried to a minimum. Yes - those patches are simple enough - but the more patches you have, the less likely you are going to spot a malicious patch inbetween. Best, Wolfgang [1]: https://postgr.es/m/flat/ZgdCpFThi9ODcCsJ%40momjian.us
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: