Re: application_name in process name?
| От | Jim Nasby |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: application_name in process name? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | e5e288ae-5584-f35a-3e49-97d630192d5f@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: application_name in process name? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: application_name in process name?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/13/16 12:07 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mike Blackwell <mike.blackwell@rrd.com> writes:
>> There are times when it would be useful to have the application_name
>> connection parameter displayed in the process name - and thus in ps and
>> pg_top - in addition to the user and database name.
>
>> Would there be any downside to this?
>
> In a lot of situations ("top" for instance) only a limited number of
> characters can be displayed from a process title. I'm hesitant to add
> fields to that string that we don't really need.
Could we make this configurable, similar to log_line_prefix?
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: