Re: [rfc,patch] PL/Proxy in core
От | Marko Kreen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [rfc,patch] PL/Proxy in core |
Дата | |
Msg-id | e51f66da0805142313i6c108b57k9ddc3e5b05621a1a@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [rfc,patch] PL/Proxy in core (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [rfc,patch] PL/Proxy in core
Re: [rfc,patch] PL/Proxy in core |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/15/08, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > On Wednesday 14 May 2008 13:29, Marko Kreen wrote: > > - SGML documentation. > > - Makefile review. > > - Integrate regression tests into main test framework. > > Has PL/proxy been tested on other OSes? FreeBSD/Solaris/Windows? It definitely works on Linux and MacOS. I've seen ports for *BSD. I think any unix-like OS-es should work fine. In fact, only syscalls it does on its own are gettimeofday() and poll() [or select()], otherwise it calls either core or libpq functions. So I see no reason why it shouldnt already work on Windows. The biggest portability problem thus far has been scanner.l, which at the beginning was written for flex 2.5.33+, but 2.5.4 is still pretty widespread. But this I fixed in 2.0.3. Hmm.. Now that I think about it, in my effort to remove malloc() calls in both scanner and parser I told bison to use alloca(). Is it portability concern? Easy to fix, just need to be careful not to create memleaks. -- marko
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: