Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Added the Skytools extended transaction ID module to contrib as
От | Marko Kreen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Added the Skytools extended transaction ID module to contrib as |
Дата | |
Msg-id | e51f66da0710080949g53e5db95h4a4c2b8c0858cff8@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Added the Skytools extended transaction ID module to contrib as (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Added the Skytools extended transaction
ID module to contrib as
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Added the Skytools extended transaction ID module to contrib as |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/8/07, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 11:32:19PM +0000, Jan Wieck wrote: > > Log Message: > > ----------- > > Added the Skytools extended transaction ID module to contrib as discussed > > on CORE previously. To explain the situation, the public discussion about the current submission happened here: http://lists.pgfoundry.org/pipermail/skytools-users/2007-September/000245.html and here: http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-hackers/2007-September/000057.html And ofcourse, the original submission was at 2006-07 to _8.2_: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-07/msg00157.php It was rejected then mostly on 3 reasons (from my POV): - it was messy and contained unnecesary cruft. - it was submitted to core not /contrib - slony was not interested in it at that moment Now as you can read from recent disussion we had, we found out that it would be *really* *really* cool if it would appear in 8.3... Talk about last moment... Because of the bad timing it would have been -core call anyway whether it gets in or not so Jan asked -core directly. That's my explanation about what happened, obviously Jan and Tom have their own opinion. -- marko
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: