Re: Inefficient bytea escaping?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Marko Kreen
Тема Re: Inefficient bytea escaping?
Дата
Msg-id e51f66da0605270836h4ea88ce3r768f3bd0eda08c8f@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Inefficient bytea escaping?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Inefficient bytea escaping?  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 5/27/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> "Marko Kreen" <markokr@gmail.com> writes:
> > If you want to use fwrite as string operator, then maybe
> > should replace it with fwrite_unlocked?
>
> ISTM that in a single-threaded application such as the backend,
> it should be libc's responsibility to avoid such overhead, not
> ours.

Obviously, except glibc guys seems to be philosophically
opposed to this, so apps need to work around it.

AFAIK at least *BSDs have got this right, don't know
about others.

-- 
marko


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: LIKE, leading percent, bind parameters and indexes
Следующее
От: Martijn van Oosterhout
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: LIKE, leading percent, bind parameters and indexes