Re: pgcrypto sha256/384/512 don't work on Redhat. Please help!
От | Marko Kreen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgcrypto sha256/384/512 don't work on Redhat. Please help! |
Дата | |
Msg-id | e51f66da0605090437o320969f4vae8f787b79b43332@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgcrypto sha256/384/512 don't work on Redhat. Please help! ("Joe Kramer" <cckramer@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgcrypto sha256/384/512 don't work on Redhat. Please help!
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 5/9/06, Joe Kramer <cckramer@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, but I need it to work out-of-the-box, with standard installation of > RedHat or Gentoo and standard PostgreSQL rpm. > > I am developing application with PortgreSQL and I can't tell customer to > "Recompile PostgreSQL and see if it works then try to use non-openssl > pgcrypto or try to compile openSSL 0.9.8." > > Pgcrypto depends on OpenSSL 0.9.8. And 0.9.8 is not "Stable" in RedHat and > Gentoo. So you need to recompile pgcrypto/openssl anyway if you want to use > it. Can I report this in PostgreSQL bug system? What bug are you refering to? Only bug that I can see is the symbol-conflict problem, but as 8.1 pgcrypto uses always same setting as core postgres, it should not be a big deal. The fact that Fedora pgcrypto is linked with OpenSSL that does not support SHA256 is not a bug, just a fact. OTOH, the nicest solution to your problem would be self-compiled pgcrypto, that would work with stock PostgreSQL. As the conflict happens with only (new) SHA2 functions, I can prepare a patch for symbol conflict, would that be satisfactory for you? -- marko
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: