Re: [HACKERS] scram and \password
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] scram and \password |
Дата | |
Msg-id | e4c3807b-fc53-5657-5372-b156e673a9d5@iki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] scram and \password (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] scram and \password
Re: [HACKERS] scram and \password |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/14/2017 04:47 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> I'm not talking about changing the default, just having it be possible >> to use \password with the new system as it was with the old, whatever >> exactly we think that means. > > Seems to me the intended behavior of \password is to use the best > available practice. So my guess is that it ought to use SCRAM when > talking to a >= 10.0 server. What the previous password was ought > to be irrelevant, even if it could find that out which it shouldn't > be able to IMO. If the server isn't set up to do SCRAM authentication, i.e. there are no "scram" entries in pg_hba.conf, and you set yourself a SCRAM verifier, you have just locked yourself out of the system. I think that's a non-starter. There needs to be some more intelligence in the decision. It would be a lot more sensible, if there was a way to specify in pg_hba.conf, "scram-or-md5". We punted on that for PostgreSQL 10, but perhaps we should try to cram that in, after all. - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: