Re: Patch to add a socketTimeout property.
От | Toru SHIMOGAKI |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch to add a socketTimeout property. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | e43b8e4f0804111727j535b62e3i4e356295b19b0023@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch to add a socketTimeout property. (Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch to add a socketTimeout property.
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
2008/4/11, Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>: > I don't see a danger with exposing them as options as long as the pros and > cons are clearly explained. How about the following list to compare keepalive and socket timeout? Please add other topics, if any. keepalive socket timeout ------------------------------------------------------------------ Configurability No in Java Yes (depend on OS setting) Target All connections Each connection Standard timer 2 hours Depend on users setting Influence All of applications Long running query on a same OS using a same connection Overhead Network for CPU for timer keepalive proves On the other hand, should we provide the both properties and users chose either of them depend on their requirement? -- Toru SHIMOGAKI <shimogaki.toru@gmail.com>
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: